قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Science / The GOP chairman predicts that Trump’s 2024-month goal will face a “challenge” in the Senate

The GOP chairman predicts that Trump’s 2024-month goal will face a “challenge” in the Senate



“In order to prioritize a lunar landing, the number of things that are also a priority should be reduced,” Moran, who also sits on the Senate’s Committee on Trade, Science and Transport, told POLITICO. “We will try to provide all the necessary funds to keep Artemis on track to land on the moon, but it is and will remain a challenge.”

For example, he said: “I do not think that our subcommittee or the Committee on Budgets will omit STEM training so that the money can be used elsewhere.”

The Trump report in March 2019 announced that it planned to land the closest man and first woman on the moon by 2024 at the latest, shifting the timeline from 2028. Unlike previous Apollo missions, the US is preparing to create a permanent lunar presence, with astronauts remaining in orbit. orbit around the moon for several months at a time of research to help NASA prepare for a future manned mission to Mars.

Trump̵

7;s efforts to postpone the landing by four years have also caused this problem by greater partisanship. However, Moran insisted that his subcommittee mostly overcame him by focusing on the science that could be practiced on the moon.

“Some have been skeptical that this is a political effort related to the calendar of election cycles,” he said. “I have no evidence that this is the case. … We managed to overcome this by following the science and politics – not politics – of an early return to the moon. “

Moran also spoke about his panel’s plans to mark the Senate bill on NASA budgets, how it would approach final negotiations with Parliament, and how the landing of Apollo Moon sparked his personal interest in space.

This transcript has been modified for length and clarity.

What is the status of the Senate fiscal law on budget funds for NASA until 2021?

These were pieces that are just beginning and stopping our efforts. We missed the date we thought we were tagging our account. We are now waiting for a broader agreement between the Republicans and the Democrats in the Senate so that we can return to work with the budget.

Our account is definitely not finished, but we have ideas that we hope to introduce when we get to the point … [of] submission of our report to the whole committee. Our efforts were two-sided. [Subcommittee ranking member] Its. [Jeanne] Shaheen (DN.H.) and I work closely together to develop and [commerce, justice, science and related agencies] a draft budget that reflects common priorities between Republicans and Democrats. We hope that, once again, unanimity will be reached between the whole committee and consideration within the Senate.

Do you have a new date to target?

There is a consensus to suggest that the Committee on Budgets will not submit Senate budget proposals until after the August break. … We hope to be fully involved in the budget allocation process in September.

What are your top priorities for NASA spending in fiscal 2021?

I am an ally of NASA’s desire to return a man and a woman to the moon. … I think that speeding up the time in which this can and should happen is useful when NASA and its private partners focus on an extremely important mission. I praised NASA for developing the idea of ​​returning to the moon. Our budget accounts in the past have shown that not only do we say that we support this mission, but we have also been able to do so by providing resources to help fulfill this mission. In 2021, I would expect our bill to reflect this goal of this effort again.

In our jurisdiction, we have received a certain amount of money that you can spend money on. NASA is an important part of our jurisdiction, but also within NASA’s budget, it is important for me to keep spending on things that are important in addition to trying to land on the moon.

NASA’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2021 … proposed a reduction in the budget for ongoing programs of approximately $ 1 billion. In order to give priority to lunar landings, the number of things that are also a priority should be reduced. I understand and appreciate the importance of, for example [science, technology, engineering and math] education. From both a political and a political point of view, I do not think that our subcommittee or the Committee on Budgets will omit STEM training so that money can be spent elsewhere.

We still need to find the right balance in all [the subcommittee’s] jurisdiction, but also within NASA spending. As a Kansan, I come from a state where aviation is extremely important. NASA’s first “A” is aviation, and it is a very important part of NASA’s priority and focus. We will have to find ways to find the right balance while still trying to move forward to our goal of reaching the moon.

Is there support for the 2024 landing bipartisan in your committee?

This is general. Some feared skepticism that it was a political effort related to the calendar of election cycles. I have no evidence that this is the case. But I think it lends a bit of political skepticism, but we were able to overcome it by watching science and politics – not politics – return to the moon early. Within our committee, Artemis enjoys bilateral support.

How do you deal with Parliament’s expenditure account, which reduces the funding for the Moon mission?

We will try to provide all the necessary funding to keep Artemis on track for a monthly landing, but it is and will remain a challenge. … How do you prefer the limited amount of money we have to spend on a wide range of things from the Department of Commerce to the census to the NOAA to the National Meteorological Service? These are all things that are important in our jurisdiction, but we will try to find the right balance.

We will certainly try to negotiate with Parliament in a conference … to maintain Artemis’ goal of advancing by finding a bilateral and bicameral solution to these levels of spending. … Everyone might have a slightly different opinion on what to prefer. Our task is to find something that is acceptable to 60 senators and 218 members of the house and that can be signed by the president.

Other areas that you expect to be different from the House Act?

I have not yet had interviews with my colleagues in Parliament to get a feel for … the thought process that is behind spending priority. I think we’ll see how we solve it. When we work on our law, we will try to comply with this resolution. We’re not going to do anything else just to do it differently … or to pay attention to them. When we go to the conference, we will try to reach a point where there is a certain understanding and direction that gives an easier solution rather than a fight.

Are you personally interested in the space that led you to seek this subcommittee post?

I must be at the age when the landing of Apollo caught my attention as a child. I have a goal for my own state, but it also applies to the country to value and value things that encourage young people to pursue a profession in science, mathematics, engineering and research. I want Kansas and the country to reward those who have this ability to inspire people. It is important for the future of our nation.

It is important for our national defense and for the economy of our country. The future of the United States depends in part on the amount of effort and resources we invest in science, research, technology, and engineering. It is therefore my personal interest that it is really important for our country and its future that the inspiration that comes from space develops the next generation of scientists and technicians.


Source link