Attorneys for Meghan Markle on Wednesday asked a judge in a London court not to disclose the names of five of her friends when she kept a British daily about the privacy violation.
Meghan, a lawyer, said her friends, who had prevented her from anonymous interviews with magazines last year, are innocent parties who fear the disruption if their name comes out. The aim of her lawsuit, Associated Newspapers Ltd., is that the principle of open justice – the public’s right to information – means that friends should be identified.
The Duchess of Sussex has filed a lawsuit against the British newspaper and website MailOnline in the British Supreme Court for five articles that published parts of a handwritten letter she wrote to her estranged father Thomas Markl after her marriage to Prince Harry in 2018.
A MEGANARY MARKET WHICH WAS NOT “FORECASTED” BY A ROYAL FAMILY DURING PREGNANCY, CONSULTED BY NON-PERFORMING: JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS
Meghan, 38, is seeking damages from the publisher for alleged misuse of private information, copyright infringement, and data breaches. Her lawyers claim that the publication of the letter was “an obvious and unjustified interference with her private and family life”. Associated Newspapers claims that it will strongly challenge this claim.
At a half-day pre-trial hearing, Meghan’s lawyers asked Judge Mark Warby to ban the disclosure of the personal details of friends who spoke to People magazine in early 2019 to condemn the Duchess’s alleged harassment by the British press.
The names of the women are included in a confidential court document, but have only been publicly identified as A to E.
Meghan’s lawyer Justin Rushbrooke argued that the court has a duty to “protect the identity of confidential journalistic sources.”
MEGAN MARKET, PRINCE HARRY ANNOUNCES NO LONG-TERM COOPERATION WITH CERTAIN BRITISH TABLOIDS
He said that with the full start of the defamation trial, the court should be careful and protect “an innocent party who fears intrusion.”
Post lawyer Antony White said that granting anonymity would undermine “the vital principle of open justice.”
“Friends are important potential witnesses on a key issue,” Biely said in a written argument. Removing their names would be a major restriction on the right of the media and the defendant to report the case and the public’s right to know. . “
The Associated Newspapers said it was Meghan’s friends who brought the letter to Thomas Markl into the public sphere and described it in the article People. He argues that the details of the letter in this article must come “directly or indirectly” from the Duchess.
But Rushbrooke said Meghan didn’t know at the time that her friends were talking to the magazine. He said the anonymous interviews were held by one in five friends, who feared criticism of the toll media that the Duchess was pregnant with at the time with her first child.
In her testimony in the case of the Duchess, she stated that “each of these women is a private citizen, a young mother and each has a fundamental right to privacy.”
TEXTS FROM THE MEGANAL MARKET, PRINCE HARRY, REGISTERED BY TOMAS MARKLE ESTIMATED IN A JUDICIAL DOCUMENT
“These five women are not in court and I am,” she wrote. “The publisher of Mail on Sunday is the one who is on the exam. It is this publisher who has acted illegally and is trying to avoid liability; create a circus and divert attention from this case – that the post office illegally published my private letter on Sunday. “
Meghan, a former star of the television legal drama “Suits”, married Queen Elizabeth II’s grandson in May 2018. At a rich ceremony at Windsor Castle in May 2018. Their son Archie was born the following year.
In January, the couple announced that they had resigned as older members of the royal family.
CLICK HERE TO GET FOX NEWS
Neither Wednesday, Harry, nor Meghan appeared in court. The judge said he would make a decision “as soon as possible.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.